Scuderia West Formula I
  • AFM Forums Index Formula 40
  • F-40 Racers: Split into LW & HW for 2009?


    Reply to topic

    Should F-40 be split into LW & HW?

    6
    21%
    13
    46%
    7
    25%
    2
    7%
     
    Total Votes : 28
    Zerox
    Rick Williams


     
    Posts: 10
    Joined: 11 May 2008
      Send private message View user's profile
      Reply with quote

    Zerox » Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:02 pm

    I just turned 40 last week and I already get to participate in an F40 poll? This old age stuff is grand!

    _________________
    #123


    Lokisdog
    Eric Arnold


     
    Posts: 48
    Joined: 20 Feb 2005
      Send private message View user's profile
      Reply with quote

    Lokisdog » Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:04 pm

    TWF wrote:Eric,
    you are looking at what is on grid now.
    if grid is split at 600 or smaller and over how many new entries you would get?
    how many over 40 race 600 but not F40,same for small bikes.
    what is goal of splitting it?


    All good questions, don't know how to get the data to project what it might look like if guys who are over 40 but don't bother because they are on smaller bikes might decide to run if they didn't have to go against liter bikes.

    Another possibility is that with 5 possible classes to chose from (600 Prod and SB, 750 Prod and SB, F1) the 600's have enough places to run without us needing to create another class for them. If the 600 rider is over 40 they can run 6 classes, 7 if they can make the FP cutoff.

    Better question is why split it, I voted to leave it as is. You want to win races you need to run fast laps, this is the AFM after all. The top 20 in 600 superbike showed last weekend that a 600 can run as fast if not faster times than the top 10 in F-40 and most of the liter bikes, so I don't really think it's displacement that is the issue. The guys running in the front of F-40 are just plain fast, regardless of displacement.

    F-40 has stepped it up in the last couple of years, 2:00's at Thunderhill just won't cut it. Last race you had to do 1:55 or better to just get into the top 7. However a 600 in the right hands is more than capable of doing way better than 2:00, so I think this is not really something to spend a lot of time on, esp., when the 600's have plenty of classes they can be competitive in if they think they can't be competitive against the liter bikes.

    - Eric Arnold
    #235


    TWF
    Zoran Vujasinovic


     
    Posts: 658
    Joined: 21 Jan 2005
    Location: not california
      Send private message View user's profile Send e-mail
      Reply with quote

    TWF » Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:08 pm

    Lokisdog wrote:

    Better question is why split it,


    because there are racers that would like to run in class but don't due to having to compete against big bikes.this racers asked for split.
    so,it is for additional entries in class.

    _________________
    two heads are better than one


    Lokisdog
    Eric Arnold


     
    Posts: 48
    Joined: 20 Feb 2005
      Send private message View user's profile
      Reply with quote

    Lokisdog » Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:25 pm

    TWF wrote:
    Lokisdog wrote:

    Better question is why split it,


    because there are racers that would like to run in class but don't due to having to compete against big bikes.this racers asked for split.
    so,it is for additional entries in class.


    So are these 600 guys or SV 650 and under guys?

    It would only make sense to do if you had a large number of SV 650 and under guys, since the 600's are pretty capable of running against the liter bikes even at Thill and BW.

    The poll results so far seem to indicate it's SV650 guys and under...

    - Eric Arnold
    #235


    TWF
    Zoran Vujasinovic


     
    Posts: 658
    Joined: 21 Jan 2005
    Location: not california
      Send private message View user's profile Send e-mail
      Reply with quote

    TWF » Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:31 pm

    don't know.looks like 650 guys.
    reason split per Alex would be best.
    if not I don't see reason to split at all.
    wera has split on 2,heavyweight and middleweight.most like they don't have enough lightweights to add another.they also known not to like big speed differential in sprints(they don't allow sv's to race in 600 classes).

    _________________
    two heads are better than one


    TWF
    Zoran Vujasinovic


     
    Posts: 658
    Joined: 21 Jan 2005
    Location: not california
      Send private message View user's profile Send e-mail
      Reply with quote

    TWF » Tue Sep 09, 2008 10:50 pm

    Lokisdog wrote:

    The poll results so far seem to indicate it's SV650 guys and under...

    - Eric Arnold
    #235

    our pit alone has 3 that qualify Smile
    there is bunch of over 40 in 650.

    _________________
    two heads are better than one


    AFM327
    Craig Sanders


     
    Posts: 249
    Joined: 26 Jan 2005
      Send private message View user's profile
      Reply with quote

    AFM327 » Wed Sep 10, 2008 10:07 am

    At least one 400 too, though it is fun to run it at Sears, pass the big bike in corner, get passed back before the next turn, rinse and repeat. Smile

    _________________
    Craig Sanders AFM 327
    Flying Weasel Racing


    hrcrider
    Tim Kamholz


     
    Posts: 19
    Joined: 05 Feb 2005
      Send private message View user's profile
      Reply with quote

    hrcrider » Sun Sep 14, 2008 9:25 am

    I would like to see the F40 split into LW and HW. I wrote Kevin Smith about the cut off being 750 and below. The only reason I think 750 and below is because of that Damn Triumph 675. Otherwise I would say 600cc and below. Also I read some one stating that 600's have plenty of classes to run. This is true, but you are always racing against 750's if you do. I myself have a bling bling 600, so noway way can I run Production. So in reality I can only run 1 600 class. That being 600 Superbike. Other than that I am constantly fighting the bigger bikes. Which I really don't mind. But if there is a rule change for F40 I vote for 750 and below for LW and 750 and above for HW.

    Timmer #15


    scooby-doobie
    Allen Erkman


     
    Posts: 16
    Joined: 12 Mar 2008
      Send private message View user's profile
      Reply with quote

    scooby-doobie » Mon Sep 15, 2008 6:31 pm

    TWF wrote:
    Lokisdog wrote:

    The poll results so far seem to indicate it's SV650 guys and under...

    - Eric Arnold
    #235

    our pit alone has 3 that qualify Smile
    there is bunch of over 40 in 650.


    //Raises hand. I would like to run F40 = CLW. Very Happy


    Zerox
    Rick Williams


     
    Posts: 10
    Joined: 11 May 2008
      Send private message View user's profile
      Reply with quote

    Zerox » Fri Oct 03, 2008 8:05 am

    So I raced F40 last weekend for the first time on my SV650, it was fun but I would definitely vote for keeping the 600-750-1000 bikes as the big class, and a FIV-ish subsection of F40 as the small class.

    Good vibe out there in F40, us old people are more polite when passing. Laughing

    _________________
    #123


    675 Trip
    Eric Snyder

    Site Admin
     
    Posts: 410
    Joined: 08 Jan 2007
    Location: Castro Valley, CA
      Send private message View user's profile Visit poster's website
      Reply with quote

    675 Trip » Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:32 pm

    I checked the results and you got first place in lightweight... Oh yeah, you got last place, too. It seems like you were in a pack of 600's lending some credence to the concept that 650's are pretty competitive with a lot of 600's.

    Are there really very many SV's that are going to run in yet another class (and pony up another $50-$60) each weekend?

    It would be nice to see some "I would race lightweight" responses. It seems like the 600's and 750's are the most disadvantaged group. 3 in the top 10.

    Maybe there should be LW+MW and HW class. or all 3 and combine two smallest.

    At the same time, I am a big fan of one trophy max for every 4 entries in a class with a minimum of 3 for a 1st. sending three bikes to a grid for a 1,2,3 trophy is ridiculous.

    _________________
    http://www.Race-Oil.com
    Race-Oil.com featuring AMSOIL
    2012 AFM 710
    Class Sponsor for Formula IV - 2007, 2008, 2009
    Buy Amsoil through Viets Performance http://viets-performance.com/ support both of us.


    TWF
    Zoran Vujasinovic


     
    Posts: 658
    Joined: 21 Jan 2005
    Location: not california
      Send private message View user's profile Send e-mail
      Reply with quote

    TWF » Fri Oct 03, 2008 12:50 pm

    675 Trip wrote:It seems like you were in a pack of 600's lending some credence to the concept that 650's are pretty competitive with a lot of 600's.

    what drugs you use Laughing
    since when bike competitiveness is measured by some riders?
    do lap times achieved by this two bikes mean anything to you?

    _________________
    two heads are better than one


    Zerox
    Rick Williams


     
    Posts: 10
    Joined: 11 May 2008
      Send private message View user's profile
      Reply with quote

    Zerox » Fri Oct 03, 2008 1:06 pm

    675 Trip wrote:I checked the results and you got first place in lightweight... Oh yeah, you got last place, too. It seems like you were in a pack of 600's lending some credence to the concept that 650's are pretty competitive with a lot of 600's.


    Actually I think I beat at least one GSX-R1000 too. Using your logic, should I enter my SV650 in Formula Pacific next? Laughing

    _________________
    #123


    CoreyClough
    Corey Clough


     
    Posts: 382
    Joined: 20 Jul 2005
    Location: San Francisco
      Send private message View user's profile Send e-mail MSN Messenger
      Reply with quote

    CoreyClough » Wed Oct 29, 2008 4:19 am

    I am over 40 and have an older '85 GPz 550(a few of them to be exact), and they really don't classify in much of anything that I can see, except for Super Dinosaur, Clubman, or F-40. Bike is not old enough to be classified for any vintage classes. I am working towards getting involved in racing, and although my imput may not count at this point, having a class for smaller bore bikes like the mentioned LW ( up to 599cc )would definitely attract my interest to spend my $$. Sure I could buy a newer bike, but these ar so much easier to work on.

    _________________
    AFM #944
    AHRMA #94R

    www.MotionPro.com
    GPz550.com http://www.nwsca.com/scripts/gpz_forum_2005/default.asp


    Zerox
    Rick Williams


     
    Posts: 10
    Joined: 11 May 2008
      Send private message View user's profile
      Reply with quote

    Zerox » Mon Dec 15, 2008 7:33 pm

    What was the final verdict on F40 having little-bike and big-bike categories?

    _________________
    #123



    Reply to topic

    Formula 40

    You cannot post new topics in this forum
    You cannot reply to topics in this forum
    You cannot edit your posts in this forum
    You cannot delete your posts in this forum
    You cannot vote in polls in this forum