|
|
|
|
AFM Forums Index ‹ General Community
- airforce.com
Rick Williams
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 21 Jan 2005
- Location: Concord/Clayton
airforce.com » Tue Jan 25, 2005 10:42 pm
Are we running the same Infineon layout as '04, or switching to the AMA Turn 9?
- afm24
Kevin Smith
-
- Posts: 627
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005
- Location: VoHD
afm24 » Sat Jan 29, 2005 11:18 am
The AFM will be running the AMA configuration.
Prior to our first race, the dirt area between the AMA chicane and the old Turn 9 will be paved, giving a safer runoff area. Of course, none of our racers will be needing that, right?
_________________ Regards,
Kevin Smith
AFM #24X
El Presidente 2005-2008
- airforce.com
Rick Williams
-
- Posts: 69
- Joined: 21 Jan 2005
- Location: Concord/Clayton
airforce.com » Sun Jan 30, 2005 1:43 pm
Wow, they are really doing good things at Infineon. Paving that dirt is a good thing.
I rode the AMA Turn 9 last winter at a track day, more than one bike was sampling the mud by overestimating their braking capabilities.
It's not entirely accurate to say we will run the AMA layout though, is it? Since the AMA keeps the Turn 1 chicane while we run the old-school Turn 1?
And isn't the AFM Turn 11 slightly different than the AMA Turn 11? I just can't keep it all straight.
- afm24
Kevin Smith
-
- Posts: 627
- Joined: 29 Jan 2005
- Location: VoHD
afm24 » Mon Jan 31, 2005 12:14 pm
>>It's not entirely accurate to say we will run the AMA layout though, is it?<<
Ah, but your initial question was only about Turn 9.
As you mentioned, we'll be running the original Turn 1 (the big sweeping version).
I think AMA actually switched to our Turn 11 last time, but I'm not positive. Regardless, we'll be running what Infineon refers to as "mid Turn 11", which is the same one we used in 2004.
In summary, we'll run the same track as in October 2004 except for changing to the new Turn 9.
- ryanb
Ryan Bellows
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: 07 Dec 2004
- Location: San Carlos, CA
ryanb » Mon Jan 31, 2005 3:06 pm
Given all the possible outcomes, I think paving the area in the turn 9 chicane and running it really is the best solution.
I'm also happy that they are moving back those huge light-poles on the exit of the carousel.
-Ryan
_________________ AFM #208
Helimot European Accessories
Kneedraggers.com
- prolariot
Kurt Spencer
-
- Posts: 51
- Joined: 24 Jan 2005
prolariot » Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:14 pm
cool... that means we can straight-line it between turns 9 and 11 on the last lap and win the race.
...only works if you yell "oops" inside your helmet really loud so the turnworkers can hear it. 
_________________ "The AFM rulebook is for reference only, actual interpretation WILL vary"
- ryanb
Ryan Bellows
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: 07 Dec 2004
- Location: San Carlos, CA
ryanb » Wed Feb 02, 2005 12:39 pm
prolariot wrote:cool... that means we can straight-line it between turns 9 and 11 on the last lap and win the race.
...only works if you yell "oops" inside your helmet really loud so the turnworkers can hear it. 
it might get a little messy with the proposed tire wall between the 9 & 11 to uh....discourage such behavior.
Then again I've got what looks like a cow-catcher for a fairing stay, maybe It'll work!!!!!
-R
_________________ AFM #208
Helimot European Accessories
Kneedraggers.com
- snowman
derek branstrom
-
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 18 Jan 2005
- Location: Where hell froze over
snowman » Fri Feb 04, 2005 1:07 pm
ryanb wrote:prolariot wrote:cool... that means we can straight-line it between turns 9 and 11 on the last lap and win the race.
...only works if you yell "oops" inside your helmet really loud so the turnworkers can hear it. 
it might get a little messy with the proposed tire wall between the 9 & 11 to uh....discourage such behavior.
Then again I've got what looks like a cow-catcher for a fairing stay, maybe It'll work!!!!!
-R
Well, if it isn't an issue to hit tires behind a corner, maybe we should go back to the original Turn 11 as well.
What's the logic to using this poorly designed, band-aid?
You're talking about eliminating one of the best parts of the track. Which happens to be part of the Sears Point logo.
Following AMAProracing is bad. They aren't headed in the right direction.
_________________ I'm freezing over here!
Derek Branstrom
LRRS #788
- afmotorsports
Alex Florea
-
- Posts: 475
- Joined: 09 Feb 2005
- Location: San Jose, CA
afmotorsports » Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:58 am
Original T11, as in the turn with ZERO runoff where KC Gager ended his racing career? No, as much as I really, really liked that turn, it was way to dangerous and the AMA T11 (or "mid-T11") is a much, much better option, plus it eliminates the need for the haybale chicane (T12) that also claimed a lot of AFM racers.
Don't confuse some of the misguided AMA actions (just my opinion) with an AMA track layout - not everything they do is a bad idea... 
- ryanb
Ryan Bellows
-
- Posts: 132
- Joined: 07 Dec 2004
- Location: San Carlos, CA
ryanb » Wed Feb 09, 2005 10:46 am
I hope someone is recording the 1st lap in 600sb with the t9 chicane, it should be memorable.
_________________ AFM #208
Helimot European Accessories
Kneedraggers.com
- kef27
kevin Stemple
-
- Posts: 6
- Joined: 27 Jan 2005
kef27 » Wed Feb 09, 2005 11:59 am
What ryanb said - except I'm going to have a "helmet-cam" view of it - I hope I survive!
_________________ #793, CBR 600RR
- lkeigwin
Lance Keigwin
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 09 Feb 2005
- Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
lkeigwin » Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:12 pm
afm24 wrote:>>It's not entirely accurate to say we will run the AMA layout though, is it?<<
Ah, but your initial question was only about Turn 9.
As you mentioned, we'll be running the original Turn 1 (the big sweeping version).
Kevin, you told me by phone last month that it would be the AMA configuration. So that's what I've been telling riders about our track days at Infineon on 2/17 and 2/18. (We always run the configuration the AFM races at Infineon and Buttonwillow.)
Some AMA guys signed up and this may be important to them. Is this a certainty as best you can say? The old T1, not the AMA T1? I have some fast talking to do.
Thanks,
Lance.
_________________ Lance Keigwin
lance@keigwin.com
http://keigwin.com (track event website)
- Guest
-
Guest » Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:42 pm
I really hope that this does not turn Sears into a crash fest. I ran ama there last years and thought that it totaly ruined the track. I thought it was also very unsafe.
- lkeigwin
Lance Keigwin
-
- Posts: 22
- Joined: 09 Feb 2005
- Location: Los Altos Hills, CA
lkeigwin » Wed Feb 09, 2005 6:56 pm
Yeah, I'm not fond of the new T1 either. For that matter I like the old T9 and T11!
If Kevin confirms the AFM will be using old T1 (and I suppose he will) then we'll run that next Thursday and Friday and I'll just apologize to anyone upset. Of course I'll have my 120 lb. rotweiller with me.
- chas
Charles Gallant
-
- Posts: 464
- Joined: 17 Jan 2005
- Location: Woodstock, GA
chas » Wed Feb 09, 2005 7:00 pm
not to ruffle any feathers, but when was there discussion to get input from the membership about the change to T9? The last I heard was in the summer time when it was said that we would revisit the discussion later on.
I never saw any board notes mention that, and I didn't hear about it at any of the meetings I attended.
Thanks
General Community
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|
| |
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|